Catalog Item

S&T Project 8142 Final Report: Costs Associated with Invasive Mussels Impacts and Management

This study explores the impacts of mussels through an evaluation of costs associated with mussel prevention strategies, ecological proxies, and costs of capital investments and operations and maintenance (O&M) expenditures to mitigate mussel-related damages at hydropower facilities. Watercraft inspection and decontamination (WID) stations are the primary strategy used to prevent the spread and introduction of dreissenid mussels throughout the West. The 2019 average annual WID budget was approximately $1,605,900. Control cost data collected through a survey from S&T Project 1876 showed that surveyed hydropower facilities experienced negative economic impacts related to control or mitigation of mussel-related damages. Facilities surveyed have spent approximately $10 million in total on preventative control measures since mussel inception. Facilities surveyed spend approximately $464,000 annually on increased maintenance. Total reoccurring maintenance costs for facilities surveyed were $650,000 per occurrence. Facilities surveyed spend approximately $88,000 in total annually on monitoring. Mussel infestation can have a variety of ecological impacts which can result in negative economic impacts. This analysis did not attempt to quantify lost ecosystem benefits, but rather it relied on existing studies to estimate a range of values for lost ecosystem or social benefits. This study provides evidence that mussels management strategies provide considerable value to the nation.
Download File Opens in new window
Generation Effort S&T Project 8142: Economic evaluation of activities associated with invasive mussel management
Location Name Western US
Type Uploaded file(s)
File Type PDF
Publisher Bureau of Reclamation
Publication Date Tuesday, August 10th, 2021
Update Frequency not planned
Last Update Tuesday, September 21st, 2021

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions of this work are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bureau of Reclamation.