- Reclamation
- RISE
- Catalog
- Report from S&T Project 22063: Collection and Analysis of Invasive Mussel Samples to Prevent the Spread and Impacts at Reclamation Reservoirs and Facilities
- S&T Project 22063 Final Report: Collection and Analysis of Invasive Mussel Samples to Prevent the Spread and Impacts at Reclamation Reservoirs and Facilities
Catalog Item
S&T Project 22063 Final Report: Collection and Analysis of Invasive Mussel Samples to Prevent the Spread and Impacts at Reclamation Reservoirs and Facilities
The Reclamation Ecological Research Laboratory (Eco Lab) provides expertise in field sampling, analytical microscopy, and molecular methods for the detection and identification of threatened and invasive species. The Eco Lab provides data that is utilized for environmental compliance and to manage invasive, threatened, and endangered species that impact Reclamation. The laboratory is currently focused on invasive dreissenid mussels and has developed expertise in multiple disciplines of this topic. The Eco Lab provides services to Reclamation regional and area offices, state aquatic invasive species (AIS) programs, water districts, and other agencies with a variety of monitoring and research projects. Over the last 3 years, as of August 30, 2024, the Eco Lab has received 4,757 samples and 1,030 field blanks. In addition, the Eco Lab provides monitoring of sites where mussels are established to assess population dynamics (e.g., Canyon Lake, AZ).
Catalog Record Title
Report from S&T Project 22063: Collection and Analysis of Invasive Mussel Samples to Prevent the Spread and Impacts at Reclamation Reservoirs and Facilities
Generation Effort
S&T Project 22063: Collection and Analysis of Invasive Mussel Samples to Prevent the Spread and Impacts at Reclamation Reservoirs and Facilities
Location Name
Western US
Type
Uploaded file(s)
File Type
PDF
Publisher
Bureau of Reclamation
Publication Date
Monday, September 30th, 2024
Update Frequency
not planned
Last Update
Thursday, March 6th, 2025
Disclaimer
The findings and conclusions of this work are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bureau of Reclamation.

