Catalog Item

S&T Project 19105 Final Report: Fish Passage at River Diversion Junction: A Science-Based Approach

This research aims to develop a science-based, numerical approach for fish passage to assist the design and evaluation of ways to reduce juvenile salmonid entrainment into or enhance passage through diversion channels at river junctures. Three current state-ofthe-art are adopted: (a) multi-dimensional flow models; (b) fish track models; and (c) knowledge of fish behaviors in response to flow features. Two flow models are updated to provide the flow variables to which juvenile fish respond: 2-D hydraulic model SRH-2D and a 3-D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. Two fish track tools, one in the Eulerian framework and the other in the Lagrangian framework, are developed so that fish entrainment at diversion channel junctures may be evaluated. A third sophisticated tool ELAM, a fish track model developed by Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), is further adopted through a collaboration with USACE. These flow and fish track tools have been applied to several diversion junctures, including Reclamation projects; valuable knowledge has been gained in understanding the ways to alter the flow features to increase or decrease fish entrainment. The research has led to the following outcomes: (a) a science-based, defensible approach for fish passage evaluation; (b) development and/or extensions of modeling tools that are linked for fish entrainment modeling studies; (c) guidelines for conducting fish passage simulations; and (d) knowledge about geometric and flow features of a diversion channel that are important for attraction or rejection of migrating Juvenile salmon passage.
Download File Opens in new window
Generation Effort S&T Project 19105 Fish Passage at River Diversion Junction: A Science-Based Approach
Type Uploaded file(s)
File Type PDF
Publisher Bureau of Reclamation
Publication Date Tuesday, September 30th, 2025
Update Frequency not planned
Last Update Tuesday, October 14th, 2025

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions of this work are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bureau of Reclamation.